Our EDI Data Surveys

The 2022 survey received a total of 384 responses from members of the community. Respondents suggested several areas of focus for future Society activities, including:

• Representation within and across the Group
• Specific support for, and representation of, women
• Improving access for/representation of/prospects for those from minority ethnic and LGBTQ backgrounds
• Improving access for/representation of/prospects for those from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds
• Improving access for those with disabilities

This feedback led to a complete refresh of our nominations process, (the process by which we appoint to our boards and committees), to work towards more diverse and representative decision makers across the organization. 

We also introduced guidance notes for our governance committees, including the use of accessible communications and the adoption of more inclusive meeting practices, such as timing meetings to avoid school and religious holidays.

When asked about the development of the survey itself respondents asked for more concrete examples of actions taken by the Society and wider scope in the disability questions to better recognize neurodivergence. This feedback led to a complete restructure of the way in which we asked about disability in the 2023 survey, introducing a new question that asked about whether barriers and limitations were experienced in everyday life, to which 20% of respondents answered yes. We also introduced a more detailed introduction to the survey to better share how we were taking actions forward across the organization.

Our 2023 survey received a total of 457 responses from members of the community. Respondents suggested several areas of focus for future Society activities, including:

• Neurodivergence in the workplace and improving access for those with disabilities
• Supporting women in biochemistry and those with caring responsibilities
• Communicating EDI data metrics for the biochemical community
• Better representation at conferences, events and on editorial boards
• Recognition and promotion of the visibility of minority scientists

This feedback led us to focus on improving our communications and resources to increase accessibility, particularly for those who are neurodivergent. Examples of this include the introduction of a ‘fuzzy search’ option on our website and staff training on the formatting and presentation of accessible documents.

We continued to operate a fully hybrid governance meetings calendar and refreshed our Care & Assistance Grant to better support those with caring responsibilities, changing the name of the grant to emphasize the range of support available and updating the applicant information to include clear examples of what could be funded. A video guide was also created to further assist in the application process.

When asked about the survey itself respondents asked for consideration of socio-economic background and biological sex; as a result questions on both of these areas have been introduced in the 2024 survey.